Skip to main content

Truth is Dead. Long Live Truth!

‘Sanity is not statistical!’ is the cry of Winston Smith in Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, rejecting the Party’s notion that the ‘truth’ is whatever a majority of people believe it to be. With the wealth of information available to us in the 21st century, we’re more equipped than ever to deviate from the commonly accepted narratives of broader society. But is it bringing us closer to Winston’s definite assurance of the truth? Or is the internet unavoidably Orwellian?

Currently the statistics of sanity are rather worrying. Research by Hope Not Hate found this year that 1 in 4 Britons believe “secret satanic cults exist and include influential elites”, with even more believing that there is “a single group of people who secretly control events and rule the world together” regardless of who is in government. This often antisemitic idea has become popularised recently via Facebook groups like QAnon.

But how, in our ‘post truth’ age, are we to say that such claims are unfounded? After all, they are compelling enough for large amounts of the population to believe in, share, and even lose friends over. Perhaps labelling people ‘conspiracy theorists’ shows an arrogance that our facts are objective and superior.

If you ever talk to a QAnon supporter, they’ll tell you to ‘open your eyes’ and stop ‘blindly believing what the mainstream media tells you’, likening you to a sheep. If you then probe them further on their views, they’ll proceed to enlighten you with information about a secret cult they’ve derived from one unverifiable ‘insider’ who never discusses anything in greater detail than can be contained in a tweet. If you ask how they know that this one source on YouTube or Facebook is trustworthy, they’ll give a wry smile and tut at your brainwashing by the monolithic mainstream media.

And that is the core irony of conspiracy theories, and the line that sets them apart from what we might consider ‘truth’. Followers of conspiracies like QAnon appear to be under the impression that simply deviating from what the rest of us believe qualifies as critical thinking. Once they’ve accepted this new belief that some shady kabal is directing world politics, their faculties for critical thinking no longer feel the need to engage. You can tell something’s a conspiracy theory if it persistently reassures you that you’re ‘opening your mind’ by unquestioningly consuming its argument.

Both sides of the political spectrum have politicised the term: left-wing journalists are hitting out more than ever against ‘right-wing conspiracies’, and right-wing politicians like Donald Trump are decrying the ‘fake news’ (a synonymous term, which is, if anything, more catchy) coming from left-wing media sources.

Many theories which were once deemed ‘conspiracies’ have actually turned out to be true. The Dalai Lama truly had been working for the CIA for a while, the CIA truly had been working on mind control for a while, and smoking really is deadly. That last one was an example of a conspiracy from major corporations to block scientific research, something which continues to this day across the world.

So, what do we take from this? That conspiracy theories are true, but to believe in them is to be closed-minded and uncritical?

Quite the opposite: on the whole, conspiracy theories earn their name. They’re mostly founded on partial truths, or no truth at all, and made up by partisan bodies to destabilise the discourse on a certain subject (i.e. smoking). But we shouldn’t dismiss that sense of curiosity these theorists claim to hold about our modern world. Deeply questioning the stories that we all tell ourselves as a society can reveal notions and prejudices that we never would have exposed otherwise, and that urge to find out what’s ‘really going on’ in the lives of those in power can lead to some important investigative journalism.

But what we’ve got to cling to, when we’re asking these questions, is verifiable proof, and the knowledge that information will always be biased, no matter where it's coming from.

Here’s a quote from Nineteen Eighty-Four, that summarises the mindset of us all, both conspiracy theorists and science believers: 

'There was truth and there was untruth, and if you clung to truth even against the whole world, you were not mad.'

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cancel All Non-Vegans

Content warnings: Discussion of animal abuse, misogyny, racism, and vegetarianism. Supposedly a fighter for social justice, Jeremy Corbyn spent much of his life eating the products of animal suffering. It's about time somebody said it. I say it with my chest: Cancel all non-vegans. Cancel all non-vegans. Cancel all non-vegans. Cancel all non-vegans. Cancel all non-vegans. Racists don't deserve platforms, respect, or sympathy. Misogynists don't deserve platforms, respect, or sympathy. Homophobes, transphobes, Israel apologists, and other violent bigots do not deserve to be pandered to, catered for, or listened to. We need them as far out of our social discourse as possible. Most reasonable people accept this. Violent people do not deserve our protection. So why are we blind to the violence of animal-eaters? My Dad's a racist. I disowned him for watching a Ben Shapiro video in 2020. My mother, seemingly sweet and kind-natured, regularly eats the flesh of once-sentient bei...
Post a Comment
Read more

Just Do Better.

This week, I left Just Stop Oil. Since April this year, I have given months of my life, multiple arrests, my mind, my voice, my heart and my energy to Just Stop Oil. It’s cost me a relationship, the respect of some friends, and caused many arguments with my family. The arrests mean I’ll likely struggle to work in the education sector, and limit my general career prospects. More than that, working for Just Stop Oil has come at the cost of my mental health. I’ve noticed myself reading less, sleeping badly, spending most of my days angry, in despair, and have developed bad habits of toxic resentment that will take a long time to work beyond. My issues with Just Stop Oil started right at the first talk I went to, given by two people I’ve got deep love and respect for and have been on arrestable actions with since. Their messaging was about “the truth”, and about how high-profile “sacrifice” is needed to stop oil before we reach a “tipping point”. This initial talk exhibited all the problem...
Post a Comment
Read more

Things Got Bitter

 Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon is sunbathing in Cyprus. Once invited to address the Oxford Union , the millionaire (who now goes by the name 'Tommy Robinson') is lounging in a five-star hotel, scrolling through his phone, sending messages to thousands of ardent followers. He had fled the UK after breaching a court order, after losing a libel battle in 2021. This wealthy, powerful, criminal terrorist, fleeing supposed political persecution in his home country in order to reap the benefits of a safer place abroad, is a figurehead of the anti-Muslim violence currently burning across the UK. He doesn't speak the local language, he's got a history of criminally stalking and harassing a woman , assaulting a police officer, and his libel case was against a 15 year-old. Naturally, this man, and all his followers, believe that powerful foreign terrorists are a great danger to our children, and that the best way to protect women is to close borders. Were the government of Cyp...
Post a Comment
Read more