Skip to main content

Truth is Dead. Long Live Truth!

‘Sanity is not statistical!’ is the cry of Winston Smith in Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, rejecting the Party’s notion that the ‘truth’ is whatever a majority of people believe it to be. With the wealth of information available to us in the 21st century, we’re more equipped than ever to deviate from the commonly accepted narratives of broader society. But is it bringing us closer to Winston’s definite assurance of the truth? Or is the internet unavoidably Orwellian?

Currently the statistics of sanity are rather worrying. Research by Hope Not Hate found this year that 1 in 4 Britons believe “secret satanic cults exist and include influential elites”, with even more believing that there is “a single group of people who secretly control events and rule the world together” regardless of who is in government. This often antisemitic idea has become popularised recently via Facebook groups like QAnon.

But how, in our ‘post truth’ age, are we to say that such claims are unfounded? After all, they are compelling enough for large amounts of the population to believe in, share, and even lose friends over. Perhaps labelling people ‘conspiracy theorists’ shows an arrogance that our facts are objective and superior.

If you ever talk to a QAnon supporter, they’ll tell you to ‘open your eyes’ and stop ‘blindly believing what the mainstream media tells you’, likening you to a sheep. If you then probe them further on their views, they’ll proceed to enlighten you with information about a secret cult they’ve derived from one unverifiable ‘insider’ who never discusses anything in greater detail than can be contained in a tweet. If you ask how they know that this one source on YouTube or Facebook is trustworthy, they’ll give a wry smile and tut at your brainwashing by the monolithic mainstream media.

And that is the core irony of conspiracy theories, and the line that sets them apart from what we might consider ‘truth’. Followers of conspiracies like QAnon appear to be under the impression that simply deviating from what the rest of us believe qualifies as critical thinking. Once they’ve accepted this new belief that some shady kabal is directing world politics, their faculties for critical thinking no longer feel the need to engage. You can tell something’s a conspiracy theory if it persistently reassures you that you’re ‘opening your mind’ by unquestioningly consuming its argument.

Both sides of the political spectrum have politicised the term: left-wing journalists are hitting out more than ever against ‘right-wing conspiracies’, and right-wing politicians like Donald Trump are decrying the ‘fake news’ (a synonymous term, which is, if anything, more catchy) coming from left-wing media sources.

Many theories which were once deemed ‘conspiracies’ have actually turned out to be true. The Dalai Lama truly had been working for the CIA for a while, the CIA truly had been working on mind control for a while, and smoking really is deadly. That last one was an example of a conspiracy from major corporations to block scientific research, something which continues to this day across the world.

So, what do we take from this? That conspiracy theories are true, but to believe in them is to be closed-minded and uncritical?

Quite the opposite: on the whole, conspiracy theories earn their name. They’re mostly founded on partial truths, or no truth at all, and made up by partisan bodies to destabilise the discourse on a certain subject (i.e. smoking). But we shouldn’t dismiss that sense of curiosity these theorists claim to hold about our modern world. Deeply questioning the stories that we all tell ourselves as a society can reveal notions and prejudices that we never would have exposed otherwise, and that urge to find out what’s ‘really going on’ in the lives of those in power can lead to some important investigative journalism.

But what we’ve got to cling to, when we’re asking these questions, is verifiable proof, and the knowledge that information will always be biased, no matter where it's coming from.

Here’s a quote from Nineteen Eighty-Four, that summarises the mindset of us all, both conspiracy theorists and science believers: 

'There was truth and there was untruth, and if you clung to truth even against the whole world, you were not mad.'

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Defense Statement

On April 3rd 2022, myself and a group of other activists from Just Stop Oil blockaded an oil refinery. We stopped the distribution of fuel from a site owned by the biggest private oil company in the world, for a total of eleven hours. As a result, I went to court with eight other activists, charged with 'aggravated trespass'. Most of us represented ourselves in court, which means we had the opportunity to give a an 'evidence statement'. This is where we are given free reign to lay out why we were doing what we were doing on the day of our arrest. None of us were there to deny what we'd done, so we pled the 'necessity' defense - meaning, essentially, that we did it because we had no other choice . Here is the statement I gave, under oath, in a court of law, as evidence that taking direct action on the climate crisis is absolutely necessary. *** Standing in a courtroom, as a young person with what the legal system describes as “good character”, the remainder o...
Post a Comment
Read more

What Lauren Lives

Lauren is still getting used to her world. Her world is still getting used to Lauren. She stumbles where she would swoosh, stammers where she would speak, sits slowly, still unsure of how to swing a skirt over even a low bench. She still sings; music moves her the same, although "man, I feel like a woman" now sends shockwaves, shivers, spineward. Lauren gets looks. Lauren gets looks of curiosity from children, of love from those who know her, who know where she comes from; Lauren gets looks like Lauren came into the world on the bottom of a boot. A boot that had walked through a hundred miles of shit. Lauren gets looks from herself, posing back at herself, posing as herself, posing. She poses. In front of clothes-shop windows, reflection as feminine as the mannequins without heads who stare with their slender shoulders into the flowing of bodies on the street. Lauren looks at the looks she gets, lucky to get good looks or to feel good-looking and even luckier to not care. Tho...
Post a Comment
Read more

Just Transition

A couple of weeks ago, I sprayed bright orange paint all over the windows of an Aston Martin storefront in London, then gave a speech about the climate emergency we're living in. I quoted the UN's Secretary-General, who has called our government "dangerous radicals" for pushing through genocidal oil and gas expansion policies that will, in no uncertain terms, kill millions of people, predominantly in the Global South. I reminded people of the context of my action: floodwaters from monsoons and glacial melt ripped 33 million people from their homes, permanently obliterating schools, hospitals, and crops across Pakistan, just last month . 16 million of those scattered from safety were children. Our moral situation right now is this: we act on the climate crisis and save billions from the horror of forced migration over the coming decades, or we get distracted by division, and allow billionaires to profit on the largest genocide the world has ever seen. Most of the comme...
Post a Comment
Read more